Reference

Facts

Headline figures from the Blueprint analysis. DHCW's £200M annual budget; £0.5M of quantified value over five years (Finance Director's own figure); 611,000 on NHS Wales waiting lists; 18 months zero PDC corrective actions; all 7 Meadows traps active; 11 reinforcing feedback loops; the £3–10B cost of inaction over five years.

Every marquee figure cited across the analysis, with its source and the date it was observed. Designed to be machine-readable and citable. DHCW's annual budget reached approximately £200M in 2025–26 against £0.5M of quantified delivered value over five years — 83p per £1,000 invested. NHS Wales has 611,000 patients on waiting lists; 30,000+ are waiting cross-border in England. The Performance and Delivery Committee generated zero corrective actions across eighteen consecutive months. The cost of inaction over five years is £3–10 billion; the cost of reform is £5–15 million.

Every marquee figure cited across the Blueprint analysis, organised for citation. Sources are named; dates are absolute. The page is licensed CC BY 4.0 — reproduce with attribution.

Money

FigureWhat it isSourceDate
~£200MDHCW’s annual budget reached this level in 2025–26DHCW board financial reports2025
~£600MCumulative Welsh Government funding to DHCW over five yearsWG allocations to DHCW, 2020–21 to 2024–252025
£0.5MQuantified delivered value across the full five-year period — the Finance Director’s own figureDHCW Finance Director (2022 Finance Director of the Year)2025
83pReturn per £1,000 of Welsh Government fundingDerived from above2025
~£1.25BDHCW’s vendor contract portfolio valueDHCW board contract registers2024–25
£100–150M / yrAnnual direct waste in the current modelThis analysis (Cost of Inaction)May 2026
£3–10B over 5yDownstream cost to NHS Wales of continuing the current model. Patient harm is a separate ledger and not monetisedThis analysis (Cost of Inaction)May 2026
£5–15MCost of implementing the full six-intervention BlueprintThis analysis (The Blueprint)May 2026

People

FigureWhat it isSourceDate
1,263DHCW staff headcount, up from 675 — an 80% increaseDHCW board headcount reports2024–25
+80%DHCW headcount growth while delivery worsenedDHCW board headcount reports2024–25
65% → 68.9%Staff burnout: 65% reported “frustrated and burnt out” in Jul 2024 survey; 68.9% in Jul 2025 survey. Both figures stripped from published board minutes (Psychological Safety)DHCW staff survey, board minutes comparison2024–2025
8,684 → 15,846Working days lost to sickness — an 82% increase across three years against headcount growth of ~30% (L1: Hiring Trap)DHCW Annual Reports2021–22 to 2024–25
+59%Long-term sickness across three years. Annual Report 2024-25 names stress and anxiety as the leading cause (Psychological Safety)DHCW Annual Report 2024-252024–25
611,000People on NHS Wales waiting listsNHS Wales statistics2025
30,000+Welsh patients waiting cross-border in NHS England because Welsh systems cannot copeNHS England cross-border activity statistics2025
3.16MPeople that depend on NHS WalesNHS Wales population coverage2025

Delivery

FigureWhat it isSourceDate
0 / 9DHCW programmes on timeDHCW programme delivery reports (Tragedy of the Commons)2024–25
12+ monthsDHCW at Level 3 enhanced monitoring — the first NHS Wales body ever held there. Escalated to Level 4 in 2026Welsh Government 5-level escalation frameworkMarch 2025 – 2026
18 monthsThe Performance and Delivery Committee generated zero corrective actions across eighteen consecutive monthsDHCW PDC minutes (Captured Governance)May 2024 – May 2025
2 of 47Phase One of Level 4 milestones missed (LIMS and WRISTS)DHCW board, March 2026March 2026
£32.9M + £13.1MDPIF revenue + capital remaining unallocated as of March 2026DHCW board minutes; Accountable Officer letterMarch 2026
8+ yearsTime WCCG has run on technology unsupported by its vendor, against repeated technical-staff warningsDHCW technical risk register (Drift to Low Performance)Ongoing
3 yearsThree consecutive years of major NHS Wales infrastructure failure: July 2024 + June 2025 near-identical data centre cooling failovers; March 2026 PSBA network outage. Same downstream signature; no corrective action visible between them (DHCW Data Centre)DHCW board minutes Jul 2024 + Jul 2025 + Mar 20262024–2026

Governance

FigureWhat it isSourceDate
7 / 7Donella Meadows’s system traps active at DHCW simultaneously. No documented precedent in public-sector digital deliveryThis analysis (Seven Traps)May 2026
11Reinforcing feedback loops identified, in two clusters — five drive delivery failure, six protect that failure from correctionThis analysis (The Diagnosis)May 2026
51Board approvals without scrutiny documented in the knowledge graph (incl. a £20M Kainos framework the Chair admitted he had not looked at, and a £226M Microsoft Enterprise Agreement passed in a single sentence)Knowledge graph of DHCW board minutes2021–2025
33DHCW directors declaring ‘nil’ on conflict-of-interest declarations while holding undisclosed UWTSD Professor of Practice titles (Thomas 10, Evans 10, Hurle 8, Hall 5)DHCW board minutes, declarations of interest (Loyalty Selection)2021–2025
4 monthsAudit Wales declared “good governance, stable and cohesive board” four months before DHCW was placed under Level 3 escalationAudit Wales structured assessment, November 2024November 2024
3 successiveNHS Wales CEOs drawn from a single health board (ABUHB), via Goodall and PagetPublic NHS Wales appointments record (Loyalty Selection)2018–2024
December 2020Three executive directors received UWTSD Professor of Practice titles — four months before DHCW’s founding board metUWTSD honorary appointment registerDecember 2020

Cited statements (verbatim)

“We’ve always struggled because it’s one-year funding. We should have worked it out by now, surely.” — Ruth Glazzard (CFO), DHCW board, March 2026.

“This persistent ambiguity, let’s call it, which we usually phrase as ‘we need to clarify roles and responsibilities’… PDC is an oversight and assurance function, not a programme management function.” — Ifan Evans, Performance and Delivery Committee, 46 months after DHCW’s founding.

“Government was asking… why then are those programs rated red amber?” — Ifan Evans on Welsh Government pressure to soften RAG ratings, PDC November 2024.

“I should have looked. I don’t know how these appear on our website as contracts.” — DHCW Chair, on the £20M Kainos framework approved without scrutiny.

“Complex, data-heavy, burdensome, lacks transparency and does not drive improvement.” — Cabinet Secretary Jeremy Miles, 2026, publicly describing the Welsh Government 5-level escalation framework — while continuing to operate it.

How to cite

Bergman, R. (2026). Facts — A Blueprint for World-Class Digital NHS in Wales. https://bluenhs.org/facts/

CC BY 4.0. Free to reproduce, share, summarise, and adapt with attribution.